Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Math Midget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • fxpose
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    Thanks Chris! I'm capping my dome today.

    Leave a comment:


  • Les
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    Originally posted by fxpose View Post
    anywhere from 4 to 10 degrees on my compound miter saw and it was a pain in the butt
    Literally - I made so many trips up and down I had sore muscles down there that I didn't even know I had.

    Leave a comment:


  • SCChris
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    Congrats George!

    Although you have the keystones to fit and place you're a hour or so away from having the dome complete, cleaning and curing aside.

    Chris

    Leave a comment:


  • fxpose
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    I layed 19 wedges on my last course this afternoon and almost every wedge had varying trapezoid angles.....anywhere from 4 to 10 degrees on my compound miter saw and it was a pain in the butt going back and forth, cutting a degree or two either on one side or both sides of each wedge.
    Now I'm left with a nice round 6.5" diameter dometop opening. I don't want to add any additional height to the dome so I will cap this opening with 3 fitted pieces which will fit flat across the top.

    George

    Leave a comment:


  • Les
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    Originally posted by 130mountainside View Post
    Les, did you even cut the faces of your bricks?
    I first cut every brick in half. The cut surface is exposed to the inside of the oven. It just looked cleaner to go that route because the outside edges of my brick were "ugly".

    Les...

    Leave a comment:


  • 130mountainside
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    Thanks, yes, as you get higher, the cuts get ridiculous. My circle shape is far from it- more oval- so the consistency of the cuts becomes irrelevant and I needed to custom cut evey brick- nightmare. Just glad this is the last row before putting in the Keystone. Les, did you even cut the faces of your bricks?

    Leave a comment:


  • GianniFocaccia
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    Les,
    Duh! Confusion was all mine. With the top-of-the-dome bricks being so small, would you consider pre-building a keystone 'plug' on the workbench and drop it in?

    John

    Leave a comment:


  • SCChris
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    Mountainside,

    Take a look at the jig I built in "my brick cutting tool" "http://www.fornobravo.com/forum/f28/my-brick-cutting-tool-12478.html". I think you could make a bunch of throw away jigs by cutting wood blocks to mirror the front to back course angle and add a bit of plywood for stability. You'd still have to set the course radius by estimation or building an extension to the rolling cutting bed and wood block jig.

    As I've said before, people understand things in different ways, brain wiring etc.. I hope this helps..

    Chris

    Leave a comment:


  • Les
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    Originally posted by GianniFocaccia View Post
    Wow...what a concept. According to Les, a 5/8" bevel on each side of the brick
    No - what I meant was that at the top of the dome, the bricks will be around 5/8 in wide to stay off bond (the bricks will get thinner and thinner as you climb). The angle cuts on each side of the brick was around 3/16 of an inch.

    Sorry for any confusion.

    Les...

    Leave a comment:


  • fxpose
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    Originally posted by GianniFocaccia View Post

    The mating of beveled-sides and non-beveled sides match up ok?
    Well, yes and no. As the 2 bricks are angled towards you as you look straight at them, then yes, they appeared to line up. But there was a slight offset where the beveled cut and non-beveled cut meet, at the bottom. When I saw this, I scrapped the idea and went with the trapezoid.

    George

    Leave a comment:


  • GianniFocaccia
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    Wow...what a concept. According to Les, a 5/8" bevel on each side of the brick (depending on the course) would suggest a noticeable non-vertical joint.

    The mating of beveled-sides and non-beveled sides match up ok?

    The immediate benefit I can see with this approach is fewer cuts not to mention that one larger cut should be more accurate than two smaller cuts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Neil2
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    That's what I did - just cut / bevel one side. Once you get going you will get the hang of judging how much bevel to slice off. This will change slightly with each row if you are doing a semi-elliptical dome.

    Leave a comment:


  • fxpose
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    To minimize exposed mortar in the chamber, I plan on experimenting by making a sharper compound cut only on just one side of each brick, instead of cutting a trapezoid shape.
    I can see this working in my head.

    Leave a comment:


  • eprante
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    130Mountainside,
    Check out the build thread Geisen. He detailed a very simple way to cut the trapezoid shape bricks for the courses using some wedges and door shims from HD. I used his system and was able to adapt it as the angles changed as I got more vertical( thought the last 2 rings got away from me a little). Good luck.
    Eric

    Leave a comment:


  • Les
    replied
    Re: Math Midget

    I tried to do that with a template and a shim. It looked good on paper, but the plan fell apart. To stay on bond, the cuts will get about 5/8 inch thick at the top - extremely hard to do by hand. If I had it to do over again, I really believe I could get closer - or buy the kit

    Les...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X