OK, I'm in the planning stage for building my dome.
Firebricks are typically 9 x 4.5 x 2.5. The practice seems to be to cut them in half and stack them so that the dome is 4.5" thick.
I'm thinking of putting the bricks in "sideways" so that the dome is 2.5" thick instead. I'm planning on cutting the bricks trapezoidally (is that a word?) so that they fit together with a minimum of mortar (and hopefully a little more strength).
Why 2.5 instead of 4.5? Well,
1) I did some heat transfer calcs and discovered that there's no way the whole brick is getting to the target 850 F. They're actually pretty well insulating if you look up the thermal conductivity.
2) I've got limited space and a significant other who has a dread of large edifices. Especially those put together by her husband. So any space savings is important, if for no other reason than I can tell her that I'm doing my best to keep the size down.
3) 2.5" seems to be OK on the floor.
4) From what I can see, the cast refractory ovens aren't 4.5" thick.
5) $$$ - fewer firebricks.
6) I have a crazy compulsion to do things differently.
Some disadvantages that I can see:
1) Lower thermal mass. So it might cool down a little faster. Counter - the heat transfer calcs I did (very rough!) tell me that I should still have a whole lot of heat.
2) Less structural integrity. Counter - I'm hoping that keeping the bricks cut to fit with small mortar joints will help here. Also, the external layer of perlcrete ought to add a little strength - not much, but enough to hold things in place assuming I do a good job with the mortar joints.
3) I have a crazy compulsion to do things differently that gets me in trouble sometimes.
Thoughts anyone? Thanks. Wonderful site BTW.
Firebricks are typically 9 x 4.5 x 2.5. The practice seems to be to cut them in half and stack them so that the dome is 4.5" thick.
I'm thinking of putting the bricks in "sideways" so that the dome is 2.5" thick instead. I'm planning on cutting the bricks trapezoidally (is that a word?) so that they fit together with a minimum of mortar (and hopefully a little more strength).
Why 2.5 instead of 4.5? Well,
1) I did some heat transfer calcs and discovered that there's no way the whole brick is getting to the target 850 F. They're actually pretty well insulating if you look up the thermal conductivity.
2) I've got limited space and a significant other who has a dread of large edifices. Especially those put together by her husband. So any space savings is important, if for no other reason than I can tell her that I'm doing my best to keep the size down.
3) 2.5" seems to be OK on the floor.
4) From what I can see, the cast refractory ovens aren't 4.5" thick.
5) $$$ - fewer firebricks.
6) I have a crazy compulsion to do things differently.
Some disadvantages that I can see:
1) Lower thermal mass. So it might cool down a little faster. Counter - the heat transfer calcs I did (very rough!) tell me that I should still have a whole lot of heat.
2) Less structural integrity. Counter - I'm hoping that keeping the bricks cut to fit with small mortar joints will help here. Also, the external layer of perlcrete ought to add a little strength - not much, but enough to hold things in place assuming I do a good job with the mortar joints.
3) I have a crazy compulsion to do things differently that gets me in trouble sometimes.
Thoughts anyone? Thanks. Wonderful site BTW.
Comment