4 Basic Fire Brick Ratings (Super-Duty, High, Medium & Low Duty).
High & Low duty bricks are more readily available since there are more applications for them in the field.
Low duty bricks are best for traditional fireplaces where temperatures do not get that high since it is a mostly open design. They are not optimum for pizza ovens since temperatures may exceed there limitations and crack which would be a total bummer after investing all the time and cost of building a home made oven from scratch! If you are purchasing new bricks, get the correct duty (see below).
High Duty Bricks are used in heavy industry where temperatures get very high since the furnaces are tightly closed and the process demands these extreme temperatures. As a side note, these bricks are more difficult to cut and may get too hot for cooking pizza. (They will certainly last a long time)
Super Duty which is for really high heat applications and not a consideration for pizza.
Medium Duty bricks with an approximate silica content of 50% and alumina content of 35% are what Forno Bravo recommend. I assume since food cooking ovens (Pompeii etc) are semi closed, and experience temperatures higher than fire places but lower than industrial furnaces, a medium duty brick is recommended.
Mt Savage FireBrick in Frostburg Maryland produces a Medium Duty Firebrick (see attached Data Sheet) with a 59.9% silica content & a 32.9% Alumina content.
This is slightly different than the percentages specified by Forno Bravo (9.9% difference in silica & 2.1% difference in alumina) I wonder if these differences have a better or worse impact on pizza quality or if anyone knows of a manufacturer with percentages closer to what Forno Bravo recommends.....
Mt savage also has a HIGH duty firebrick that has a 34.5% alumina & 58.9% silica content which seems to be close to the recommended sweet spot Forno Bravo recommends which they to refer as their MEDIUM Duty with a slightly higher Alumina content at 38%?????? There is also something referred to as a super-duty which is not even a consideration. Seems the porosity is higher.....
High & Low duty bricks are more readily available since there are more applications for them in the field.
Low duty bricks are best for traditional fireplaces where temperatures do not get that high since it is a mostly open design. They are not optimum for pizza ovens since temperatures may exceed there limitations and crack which would be a total bummer after investing all the time and cost of building a home made oven from scratch! If you are purchasing new bricks, get the correct duty (see below).
High Duty Bricks are used in heavy industry where temperatures get very high since the furnaces are tightly closed and the process demands these extreme temperatures. As a side note, these bricks are more difficult to cut and may get too hot for cooking pizza. (They will certainly last a long time)
Super Duty which is for really high heat applications and not a consideration for pizza.
Medium Duty bricks with an approximate silica content of 50% and alumina content of 35% are what Forno Bravo recommend. I assume since food cooking ovens (Pompeii etc) are semi closed, and experience temperatures higher than fire places but lower than industrial furnaces, a medium duty brick is recommended.
Mt Savage FireBrick in Frostburg Maryland produces a Medium Duty Firebrick (see attached Data Sheet) with a 59.9% silica content & a 32.9% Alumina content.
This is slightly different than the percentages specified by Forno Bravo (9.9% difference in silica & 2.1% difference in alumina) I wonder if these differences have a better or worse impact on pizza quality or if anyone knows of a manufacturer with percentages closer to what Forno Bravo recommends.....
Mt savage also has a HIGH duty firebrick that has a 34.5% alumina & 58.9% silica content which seems to be close to the recommended sweet spot Forno Bravo recommends which they to refer as their MEDIUM Duty with a slightly higher Alumina content at 38%?????? There is also something referred to as a super-duty which is not even a consideration. Seems the porosity is higher.....
Comment