Dear friends,
Thank you for the chance to ask my question at this forum!
I am investigating the use of fireclays and grogs in making a portland/hydrated lime based mortar for building an unlined chimney stack (inside structure, no freeze/thaw concerns).
My desire is to have a mortar with the best possible mix of properties - compressive strength between type O and type N, low shrinkage, weather resistance, good bond strength, adhesion, workability and excellent FIRE RESISTANCE.
I couldn't find the answer anywhere to my questions, so am trying your forum where more is known about refractories!
BACKGROUND: All standard construction mortar mixes use a ratio of 3:1, aggregate to cement (portland & lime). For example, Type N is 6:1:1, giving a 3:1 ratio aggregate to portland and lime. Type S is 9:2:1 - same 3:1 ratio. Pizza oven guys often use a 'homebrew' of 3-5:1:1:1 (sand, fireclay, lime, portland). I'm not sure why they ofter use low sand ratios. I'm leaning toward using the traditional 3:1 ratio, as I think the additional aggregate will make a mortar with better characteristics for my application. I have read that silicone sands may be the worst to use due to expansion and inversion (perhaps one reason for less sand in the pizza 'homebrew'). For that reason, I'm looking at using black beauty (coal slag) or brick grog.
QUESTIONS
1: Which is preferred, coal slag or brick grog?
2: If brick grog is used as an aggregate in place of sand to improve thermal stability, should fireclay still be added to the mix? Why?
Curious, what role does fireclay play in the formula? I am told 'heat resistance', but how so? Fireclay is much too fine to replace the aggregate and would seem to interact with or replace the cementitious portions of the mix (i.e. portland, hydrated lyme, etc.) Is this desirable? If so, in what ratio or percent?
3: I am considering the use of an acrylic admix that greatly increases abrasion and chemical resistance in traditional lime/portland cements, as well as flexural and tensile strengths and bonding. I've used the product before (Silpro C21) and had amazing results, albeit with no regard to thermal loads. I know that 'plastic' melts, but I'm not sure in this context if that fact matters. Perhaps the latex does it's job during the curing phase and can be driven off during use?
Any light you can shed on this subject would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
fastcar
Thank you for the chance to ask my question at this forum!
I am investigating the use of fireclays and grogs in making a portland/hydrated lime based mortar for building an unlined chimney stack (inside structure, no freeze/thaw concerns).
My desire is to have a mortar with the best possible mix of properties - compressive strength between type O and type N, low shrinkage, weather resistance, good bond strength, adhesion, workability and excellent FIRE RESISTANCE.
I couldn't find the answer anywhere to my questions, so am trying your forum where more is known about refractories!
BACKGROUND: All standard construction mortar mixes use a ratio of 3:1, aggregate to cement (portland & lime). For example, Type N is 6:1:1, giving a 3:1 ratio aggregate to portland and lime. Type S is 9:2:1 - same 3:1 ratio. Pizza oven guys often use a 'homebrew' of 3-5:1:1:1 (sand, fireclay, lime, portland). I'm not sure why they ofter use low sand ratios. I'm leaning toward using the traditional 3:1 ratio, as I think the additional aggregate will make a mortar with better characteristics for my application. I have read that silicone sands may be the worst to use due to expansion and inversion (perhaps one reason for less sand in the pizza 'homebrew'). For that reason, I'm looking at using black beauty (coal slag) or brick grog.
QUESTIONS
1: Which is preferred, coal slag or brick grog?
2: If brick grog is used as an aggregate in place of sand to improve thermal stability, should fireclay still be added to the mix? Why?
Curious, what role does fireclay play in the formula? I am told 'heat resistance', but how so? Fireclay is much too fine to replace the aggregate and would seem to interact with or replace the cementitious portions of the mix (i.e. portland, hydrated lyme, etc.) Is this desirable? If so, in what ratio or percent?
3: I am considering the use of an acrylic admix that greatly increases abrasion and chemical resistance in traditional lime/portland cements, as well as flexural and tensile strengths and bonding. I've used the product before (Silpro C21) and had amazing results, albeit with no regard to thermal loads. I know that 'plastic' melts, but I'm not sure in this context if that fact matters. Perhaps the latex does it's job during the curing phase and can be driven off during use?
Any light you can shed on this subject would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
fastcar
Comment