This topic has been beaten before, but not to satisfaction.
I have recently read two assertions (alright, there are more, but lets start with these) that don't quite jibe with me.
The first is the repeated mention of "reflected" heat in the Forno web cookbook and elsewhere. The other is that the porosity of the brick somehow "stores" moisture that is released during cooking.
First the reflected heat: Fire brick has an emissivity of .68, so about a 1/3 of the radiation hitting it is reflected and the rest is absorbed. The 2/3 that is absorbed is re-radiated once the thermal mass is hot. So, while the reflection is important, the re-radiation is by far the dominant source of radiation to the pizzas. It may well be that there is an optimum ratio of reflected and re-radiated heat. I'm just suggesting that re-radiated heat needs to be mentioned as well, perhaps before reflection.
The next item is far more troubling. The idea that moisture is some how residing in the porosity of a firebrick at 800 deg F, or is absorbed and released as the pizza is fired, is frankly preposterous. Water at 800F is superheated steam, the vast bulk of which will have been driven out by expansion (PV=NRT and all that). On top of this, unless the brick is cooled substantially, there is no mechanism to draw any moisture liberated from the pizza or bread into the brick. Conversely, the brick would need to increase in temperature to liberate the infinitesimal bit of remaining water it contains.
The ability of the oven to retain moisture, is much more likely the result of the closed nature of the brick oven. This is true to some extent in pizza mode, but especially when you close the door for bread.
I'm expecting resistance to these statements, so let er rip.
Enz
I have recently read two assertions (alright, there are more, but lets start with these) that don't quite jibe with me.
The first is the repeated mention of "reflected" heat in the Forno web cookbook and elsewhere. The other is that the porosity of the brick somehow "stores" moisture that is released during cooking.
First the reflected heat: Fire brick has an emissivity of .68, so about a 1/3 of the radiation hitting it is reflected and the rest is absorbed. The 2/3 that is absorbed is re-radiated once the thermal mass is hot. So, while the reflection is important, the re-radiation is by far the dominant source of radiation to the pizzas. It may well be that there is an optimum ratio of reflected and re-radiated heat. I'm just suggesting that re-radiated heat needs to be mentioned as well, perhaps before reflection.
The next item is far more troubling. The idea that moisture is some how residing in the porosity of a firebrick at 800 deg F, or is absorbed and released as the pizza is fired, is frankly preposterous. Water at 800F is superheated steam, the vast bulk of which will have been driven out by expansion (PV=NRT and all that). On top of this, unless the brick is cooled substantially, there is no mechanism to draw any moisture liberated from the pizza or bread into the brick. Conversely, the brick would need to increase in temperature to liberate the infinitesimal bit of remaining water it contains.
The ability of the oven to retain moisture, is much more likely the result of the closed nature of the brick oven. This is true to some extent in pizza mode, but especially when you close the door for bread.
I'm expecting resistance to these statements, so let er rip.
Enz
Comment