Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pdx 42" update

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Gulf
    replied
    It sounds like you may have it now. Though I did not quite understand why you would only ".....mark every other brick".
    I find it less confusing to completely mark every brick on all for sides before going to the saw.

    Also, "Finally the purple lines can be connected on the top of the wedge, yielding the yellow lines from post 189."

    It may be just the wording, but that is a little backwards. The Outside diameter scribe (yellow line) from should be established first. Then the tapered cut (purple lines) can then be drawn by connecting the intersections of the Outside Diameter And the 1.5" Reveal

    Click image for larger version

Name:	PDX Arch.jpg
Views:	739
Size:	257.4 KB
ID:	451048

    Leave a comment:


  • Macrinehart
    replied
    Gulf and UtahBeehiver, I think pictures from post 177, 189 and 191 are painting a clear picture. I guess where I'm getting confused is that the undercut that I actually cut in the picture from post 189 follows the ID of my dome. But the overcut I did was intersecting with the undercut at the inside face of my arch brick, which is the error. Also didn't help that I cut those overcuts first. But I think I understand now.

    So, when I was positioning my arch form, I set it so that the Keystone has OD and ID intersections almost exactly as Gulf has illustrated on 191. Looking at the post 189 again, I think my undercut doesn't need to change. Instead, I should measure the distance from bottom of the undercut to the top of the undercut on my keystone (about 1.5") and then mark that line on every brick in the arch. That should reproduce the blue line on post 189.

    From there I can then mark a 4.5" line on the side of each brick, staring at the blue line and intersecting with the top of the wedge at 4.5", which is the depth of my brick. That will produce the purple line shown on post 191.

    Finally the purple lines can be connected on the top of the wedge, yielding the yellow lines from post 189.

    Thanks for your patience!
    Last edited by Macrinehart; 11-27-2022, 03:46 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gulf
    replied
    Here is one included inside the link I previously shared.

    EDIT: It may not be clear in the photo. But, the OD scribe mark is on top of this brick. The purple line is the actual tapered cut. The purple line is drawn from the 1.5" reveal to the OD scribe.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	fetch?photoid=444381.jpg Views:	0 Size:	143.3 KB ID:	451045
    Last edited by Gulf; 11-27-2022, 09:13 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • UtahBeehiver
    replied
    Gulf's pic pegged the issue perfectly. The blue line should be the ID of the dome and the yellow line should be the OD of the dome as shown in my pic in post 177 and also shown in JR's post 117.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gulf
    replied
    Hopefully this rough mark up will help

    Leave a comment:


  • Gulf
    replied
    Ok. It appears that on your top dead center brick that you will have about a 1.5" reveal inside the dome. That is about perfect imo. However, the reveal on your first riser is much wider. Scribe a line on the inside of the arch to make that reveal constant through out. Then scribe an outside diameter on your dome brick. Connect the lines on each side of each brick from those reference points and there you have it. Refer back to my link. It's all there. If you need something on the link explained, I'm here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Macrinehart
    replied
    Today I was able to finish the over and undercuts for the opening arch. I repositioned the arch form per UtahBeehiver's guidance.

    I'll note this is not a perfect job, but is it good enough? Some of my overcuts were a little too deep, I think there is 3/16" - 1/4" variance, which you can see in pictures below. I'm thinking this can be resolved with a little extra morter in the problem areas, although that may not be an ideal solution if the morter is too thick?

    As always...feedback is welcome. If necessary I can pull out some problem bricks and replace them.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_98460.jpg
Views:	771
Size:	417.1 KB
ID:	451022

    Click image for larger version  Name:	20221126_160626.jpg Views:	0 Size:	431.1 KB ID:	451023 Click image for larger version  Name:	20221126_160653.jpg Views:	0 Size:	574.4 KB ID:	451024 Click image for larger version  Name:	20221126_160704.jpg Views:	0 Size:	596.4 KB ID:	451025

    Leave a comment:


  • UtahBeehiver
    replied
    The inside bottom of the arch form should be where the ID of the dome and the form intersect. The cut back is the inside arc of the dome and whether its is perpendicular or not depends on the arch shape. I attached pic showing how the IT scribes the inner dome arc, Click image for larger version

Name:	32B Inner Arch 6.15.12.JPG
Views:	760
Size:	582.5 KB
ID:	451012

    Leave a comment:


  • Macrinehart
    replied
    The tapered arch is only partially done.
    That is correct, I am working on finishing the outside cuts first, and if understand your meaning UtahBeehiver the "cut back" are the cuts that are roughly perpendicular to the cuts I've already made.

    I am going to reposition the arch support per JR's guidance after I finish the outside cuts so that I can mark the IR of the dome on the underside of the opening arch.
    Last edited by Macrinehart; 11-26-2022, 09:20 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • UtahBeehiver
    replied
    The tapered arch is only partially done. There is no cut back that follows in inner diameter of the dome. This is why the top dead center brick is the longest brick and the shortest ones are at the bottom of the arch. This is what Gulf is talking about.in his post. I also believe, as JR pointed out the arch form is too far in and affecting how the inner arch bricks are being formed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Macrinehart
    replied
    I am about 90% confident, but let me submit a drawing for reference. Because the center of the arch is elevated above the oven floor, the IR of the oven isn't equadistant from the IR & OR of the opening arch. The same is true for the Oven OR.

    In order to mark the OR I started with the keystone and shifted it to so that the IR and OR are alinged with the inside face and upper face of the Keystone. Then I linked up the inside faces of all the bricks in the arch. Finally I used a metal survey tape to mark the ray from the pivot point through the IR and marked the point where the ray intersects the OR of the opening arch.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	20221125_174745.jpg Views:	0 Size:	282.1 KB ID:	451001

    Leave a comment:


  • Gulf
    replied
    I'm trying very hard to figure out what is going on here. On a hemispherical arch the top dead center brick protrudes further into the dome than the risers? Perhaps it is the viewing angle or the inside diameter cuts are yet to be done?

    Leave a comment:


  • Macrinehart
    replied
    Good Tip JRPizza! I will adjust accordingly.


    Have cut half way around the back, top cuts.

    One thing I noted, because my opening arch is supported by one brick, the arch doesn't make a perfect semi-circle. Instead, there is a taper to the cuts moving from the keystone to the floor. I think this would be easier if it was a half circle without the supporting bricks! But then my opening would be too small. I'm committed now!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20221125_151111.jpg
Views:	808
Size:	562.0 KB
ID:	450997

    Leave a comment:


  • JRPizza
    replied
    How do you have your arch form located? The arch form can serve two purposes - to keep the arch round and level, and to "index" the arch bricks so they are in the proper fore/aft orientation and create a flat planar surface for a door to seal against. It looks to me like your form is too far back to index against which will make it a little harder to keep the forward face of the bricks in the proper location? Moving it outboard will also help you see what is going on in your dome arch interface.

    Leave a comment:


  • Macrinehart
    replied
    Here's a quick update. The enhanced IT uses a fixed caster wheel that is anchored to a cut down brick throught the center mount with three washers, 2 underneigth, one over, and liberal application of 3:1 household oil between the washers so that thw caster can rotate easily. I drilled a 3/8" x 3" threaded rod into the caster wheel and then secured a coupling nut on that rod all the way to the wheel. My IT is made with 1/2" copper pipe. It happens that a 1/2" copper coupling joint fits snuggly over the coupling nut. The other end of the IT also has a coupling nut, with a 3/8"x18" threaded rod and a couple wing nuts to help lock the threaded rod. I mounted this to my center brick and then ripped that bieck with the wet saw to ensure the caster wheel hub is centered at the oven floor height. I used the excess of the center brick to replace a couple bricks in the floor so that my caster can rotate without obstruction.

    After all this I remeasured the opening arch position and it turns out I had to pull the arch toward the center of the oven 2" to correctly intersect with the dome at the IR! I think this discrepancy was a direct result of my prior IR Pivot, with was about a half inch above the floor.

    Attaching some photos for reference.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20221125_112238.jpg
Views:	799
Size:	354.3 KB
ID:	450990 Click image for larger version

Name:	20221125_104324.jpg
Views:	780
Size:	416.0 KB
ID:	450991 Click image for larger version

Name:	20221125_110219.jpg
Views:	763
Size:	565.2 KB
ID:	450992 ​​​​​​​

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X