I am planning out a build of a Pompeii oven. In reviewing the FB PDF file on the Pompeii oven (a wonderful resource, BTW) as well as the many great posts on the forum, a question comes to mind. There is a lot of attention paid to adequately insulating the oven for efficient performance (reaching pizza temperatures rapidly with minimal fuel as well as good retained heat for other baking).
In considering the design, it seems that there is weak link (in terms of thermal performance) where the mass of the entry meets the mass of the oven dome and floor. In the situation where the fire is out and an insulated door is in place to retain heat for cooking, wouldn?t this continuity between the mass of the oven itself and the entry arch and floor be the source of significant heat drain?
It seems that some kind of heat break between the oven and the entry would significantly improve performance without adding any significant expense. Is there a reason, structurally or otherwise, why a heat break is not used here?
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Mark
In considering the design, it seems that there is weak link (in terms of thermal performance) where the mass of the entry meets the mass of the oven dome and floor. In the situation where the fire is out and an insulated door is in place to retain heat for cooking, wouldn?t this continuity between the mass of the oven itself and the entry arch and floor be the source of significant heat drain?
It seems that some kind of heat break between the oven and the entry would significantly improve performance without adding any significant expense. Is there a reason, structurally or otherwise, why a heat break is not used here?
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Mark
Comment