See attached image. Is there any utility in doing this? The argument, obviously, is that as a form of "liquid rock", the mortar conforms to the cavity into which it is placed, then solidifies into a "tab" that can no longer slide out of its "slot" (and vs/va that the slot, aka the brick, cannot slide relative to the solidified tab, aka, the mortar).
I realize that 99% of an arch's strength comes from the transfer of force between bricks, but that only works if the bricks are very precisely wedge-shaped in the first place. Might this approach help in situations where bricks are not precisely shaped?...Especially in the top section of the dome where bricks are approaching vertical and the success of the wedge shape and "arch-effect" relies heavily on precise brick shape. Could this help, even a little bit?
Is it a waste of time in that it can't help, but doesn't hurt?
Or is it a fundamentally bad idea in that it is demonstrably worse than the simpler and more conventional approach?
As an addendum, one could imagine drilling small shallow holes (1/4" diameter, 1/2" deep) instead of large pockets and inserting small metal pins such that affected brick to brick faces are joined by a shared pin. It's just another variant on the same idea. If the holes were larger than the pins, it would allow for differences in thermal expansion between the brick and metal (although would mitigate any advantage *except* when one brick started to slide in which case the pin would catch the brick after 1/8" give or take). One major difficulty of the pin idea (which the mortar pocket idea does *not* suffer from) is precise placement of the holes such that bricks line up properly during construction.
I'm just firing ideas off here. Feel free to tell me they're crazy.
Thoughts?
I realize that 99% of an arch's strength comes from the transfer of force between bricks, but that only works if the bricks are very precisely wedge-shaped in the first place. Might this approach help in situations where bricks are not precisely shaped?...Especially in the top section of the dome where bricks are approaching vertical and the success of the wedge shape and "arch-effect" relies heavily on precise brick shape. Could this help, even a little bit?
Is it a waste of time in that it can't help, but doesn't hurt?
Or is it a fundamentally bad idea in that it is demonstrably worse than the simpler and more conventional approach?
As an addendum, one could imagine drilling small shallow holes (1/4" diameter, 1/2" deep) instead of large pockets and inserting small metal pins such that affected brick to brick faces are joined by a shared pin. It's just another variant on the same idea. If the holes were larger than the pins, it would allow for differences in thermal expansion between the brick and metal (although would mitigate any advantage *except* when one brick started to slide in which case the pin would catch the brick after 1/8" give or take). One major difficulty of the pin idea (which the mortar pocket idea does *not* suffer from) is precise placement of the holes such that bricks line up properly during construction.
I'm just firing ideas off here. Feel free to tell me they're crazy.
Thoughts?
Comment