Yesterday was a good day to make decisions. Beautiful weather at last, with no urgent obligations pending. Some decisions were already made; corner build, 42inch interior, 20 inch door, FB board, FB morter, solders laid flat, the transition following the lead of Doug, John, Sharky and ggoose, with a nod to the Field Furnace guys in Australia, and with the system of cutting the bricks in three cuts at 5 degrees described by jcg 31, as well as seriously considering using the airspace idea between dome and the vent and chimney as innovated by drseward in his Colorado Oven. Then, the other decision still not made; Naples style or Tuscan style. OK I succumbed! Compromise style. [I'm sure someone can come up with a better name] I split the difference between 21 and 15.5, or about 18 inches for the dome, and 63% for the height of the entry, or about 11 inches, and am planning to going with that. By the way, why 63% why not 60 or 65? The other factor would be the area of the opening which would vary by the shape. And, I still don't know how to post photos with this text. It asks for an URL which I've been unable to find in my photo gallery.
X
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
With all those decisions and such a great plan, you must be able to share your build with everyone. To post pics: Click on Go Advanced button at bottom of frame. Scroll down to Additional Options and select Manage Attachments. Browse to the image(s) you want but make sure they have been reduced in file size to around 1Mb first. You know the rest!
Looking forward to watching your build. Constructing a WFO in your backyard, brick by brick, with your own hands has to be one of the more worthwhile things a person can do.
Naples and Tuscan = hybrid.
John
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
Thanks John- If imitation is considered the highest form of complement, then consider yourself highly complemented. I have a photo of your transition that I am using as a guide. I agree with you hybrid is a better term than compromise. gmchmLast edited by gmchm; 07-31-2011, 06:18 PM.
Comment
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
Today was another good day to make decisions, however, the day was spent in measuring and remeasuring and finially realising I had a poor idea of were the entry needed to be positioned. Once determined, I realised that I had needed not only to have read the instructions, but to have followed them. In fact there's a reason they don't show a 42 inch oven on a 62 inch corner base; it doesn't fit. Now, assuming a 14 inch minimum for the entry and chiminey, I have a 3.5 inch overhang a the corners of my fire bricks. See photo. [Thanks again Gianni] The options that occurred to me are: disassemble everthing [which is just in fireclay and sand] and move it back 3.5 inches and deal with lack of space on the back and the sides, or include the overhang in a future brick facade which would start from the ground. Does anyone have an opinion on this? Thanks, gmchm
Comment
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
gmchm,
This is a wonderful opportunity to do something you will no doubt encounter several more times over the course of your build: problem-solve. The neat thing is that at this point of your build you don't have to sacrifice much, rather plan on a couple of trade-offs. From my build I know first-hand:
1. Going with a 39" oven (instead of 42") is not only not the end of the world, it may make for a more-often used oven that is slightly easier to fire
2. It makes little sense to shortcut structural properties of your build, especially insulation
3. A less-than 14" deep entryway is very common and makes for easier oven management. I only went this deep because it gets windy at my house and I also wanted a 'holding/staging' area of my oven. Look at Les' build.
Sure, you could incorporate a decorative brick facade to accomodate the overhang just as easily as you could shorten your entryway, shift everything back (or both), or build a slightly smaller oven. Post a pic of the entire structural slab and I'm sure you'll get lots of input on a solution.
John
Comment
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
Thanks again John for the concern and quick reply. My inclination is to push everything back and see how I feel after that. I remember wondering what had changed your thinking on the floor size. I intend to use the FB blanket which I think could extend over the edges a bit if necessary. I noticed a photo on the latest page of finished ovens that appeared to have a similar situation and has resolved it pretty well, [Clanton, Alabama]. I also have a photos of Les's floor and Doug's, and one of Les's finished oven.Last edited by gmchm; 08-01-2011, 11:22 PM.
Comment
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
The real reason I reduced the size of my oven floor from 42" was a fear that the oven was too large and would require more fuel than a 39". A good number of builders here swear by their 36" ovens and the smaller an oven the more likely one is to use it.
After thinking about it, a 39" oven probably uses the same amount of wood as a 42", but cords of oak are still $350-400 in southern california.
Comment
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
Gianni- Wow thats a lot for oak wood. We pay about $180-$200 a cord here for oak. I had an interesting day today, if you call shifting my oven floor four times using a come-a-long as interesting. I think I have it postioned about as well as I can without tearing it part and rebuilding it. The idea I have now is inspired by an oven shown on page 44 of "A new set of WFO photos 7-25-11". [Thank you Forno Bravo folks] The photo shows a corner build with a shallow entryway and the fire brick used as the outer archway. I will have a little more room than that, but some one did a nice job. Is that a soapstone floor? gmchmLast edited by gmchm; 08-02-2011, 10:51 PM.
Comment
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
Originally posted by GianniFocaccia View PostThe real reason I reduced the size of my oven floor from 42" was a fear that the oven was too large and would require more fuel than a 39". A good number of builders here swear by their 36" ovens and the smaller an oven the more likely one is to use it.
After thinking about it, a 39" oven probably uses the same amount of wood as a 42", but cords of oak are still $350-400 in southern california.
ChipChip
Comment
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
Here in Minnesota one went through about 4 weeks ago and there is more wood than you can shake a stick at most free for pick-up
"waaaaaaahhhhhhh"!!!!!!!!!!
Comment
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
I have been puzzling the past couple of days about the positioning of the archway to prevent the "teardrop" effect. My conclusion is that a 42 inch oven, is that the archway needs to be set back from the opening [of say 20 inches] about 2 inchs or 5 centimeters. Is that the consensus of those that have "Been there, done that"? Thanks, gmchm
Comment
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
Originally posted by gmchm View PostI have been puzzling the past couple of days about the positioning of the archway to prevent the "teardrop" effect. My conclusion is that a 42 inch oven, is that the archway needs to be set back from the opening [of say 20 inches] about 2 inchs or 5 centimeters. Is that the consensus of those that have "Been there, done that"? Thanks, gmchm
His design seems to be a clear way to provide a nice clean arch to dome transition without developing the teardrop. I am finding that the cutting of the arch bricks it at times tedious but I believe I will avoid the dreaded sharp V bricks others have had to make. I will be starting chain 5 tomorrow and was able to join the chains to my arch for chains 1-4 today, I previously put in chain 1-4 and had not started the arch. As I said it is a little tedious cutting the arch bricks with this method as I only got 22 bricks mortared in today. By comparison I got 68 bricks done yesterday.
Transition and arch up to chain 4 completed today.
Not all my time was spent on the transition as I did cut 26 Arch bricks into their V shape and that took a while to set up and do the 4 degree cuts to both sides of a full brick. I also built the Arch form and put it in place.
Photo 1) Start of the day.
Photo 2) Start of Arch Transition
Photo 3) Me Working
ChipChip
Comment
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
Mrchipster- Thanks for your reply. I reread Gianni's thread and downloaded his sketchup drawing, but the answer I was looking for, I think, was Sharky's photo and post where he points out that all you have to do in this arch method, to avoid the teardrop, is to use longer bricks. I had read this before, but that point hadn't registered.Last edited by gmchm; 08-06-2011, 09:40 AM.
Comment
-
Re: Silverton,Or. Oven
My conclusion is that a 42 inch oven, is that the archway needs to be set back from the opening [of say 20 inches] about 2 inchs or 5 centimeters
What really helps in eliminating the droop, IMHO, is to cut the arch bricks to extend backwards into the dome. This way the interior profile above the arch stays intact and keeps the dome in round. Note that as the arch progresses upwards the bricks become deeper, taller, and protrude progressively inwards to match the interior profile of the oven at that level. This I learned from the pic of the fantastic Guastavino (thanks tscar) architecture displayed at New York City's Oyster Bar. These pics kinda show what I mean. The FB plans call for an arch of uniform depth throughout.
For inner arch placement, it may help to read the discussion (Round Shape) here, starting with post #121
http://www.fornobravo.com/forum/8/ro...-14700-13.html
The drawing I was referring to (post #126 ) shows what the inner arch would look like from both the profile and plan view.
Hope this helps,
John
Comment
Comment