Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pdx 42" update

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Macrinehart
    replied
    At the end of the day I've been able to mark up all but the last 2 blocks in the arch. The 5 blocks at the peak of the arch, including the keystone, were cut two deep on the overcut so will have to be redone. The rest can be salvaged.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gulf
    replied
    Should be close enough for "brick work"

    Leave a comment:


  • Macrinehart
    replied
    I thought it would be a challenge to measure the OD, but I'm doing pretty well with a yardstick and "compass" attachments. 4 bricks in, it seems pretty consistent that the OD intersects the outside of the dome at the depth of 4.5", which happens to align with the depth of the oven wall bricks. Pictures to illustrate...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20221127_151138.jpg
Views:	486
Size:	493.4 KB
ID:	451053 Click image for larger version

Name:	20221127_152230.jpg
Views:	462
Size:	468.7 KB
ID:	451054 Click image for larger version

Name:	20221127_152630.jpg
Views:	431
Size:	435.4 KB
ID:	451055 Click image for larger version

Name:	20221127_153025.jpg
Views:	469
Size:	412.7 KB
ID:	451056

    Leave a comment:


  • Gulf
    replied
    There are some simple but, precise methods for marking the OD. The link that I shared shows one method. This one was made from a coping saw that I took apart temporarily for the job. There are others. Any offset that will allow you to mark around the corner and attached to the pivot point to gauge the distance from it will work. The staged pic below only shows one brick being marked. However, on this build, the OD and ID for the entire arch was actually marked at one time while it was dry stacked.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	fetch?photoid=444376.jpg
Views:	402
Size:	406.1 KB
ID:	451051

    Leave a comment:


  • Macrinehart
    replied
    Hehe...did I say "every other"? meant "every".

    I think my method for measuring the OD would be a bit inprecise. But I will mark every brick first and then rebuild the arch and check all the measures before I start cutting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gulf
    replied
    It sounds like you may have it now. Though I did not quite understand why you would only ".....mark every other brick".
    I find it less confusing to completely mark every brick on all for sides before going to the saw.

    Also, "Finally the purple lines can be connected on the top of the wedge, yielding the yellow lines from post 189."

    It may be just the wording, but that is a little backwards. The Outside diameter scribe (yellow line) from should be established first. Then the tapered cut (purple lines) can then be drawn by connecting the intersections of the Outside Diameter And the 1.5" Reveal

    Click image for larger version

Name:	PDX Arch.jpg
Views:	394
Size:	257.4 KB
ID:	451048

    Leave a comment:


  • Macrinehart
    replied
    Gulf and UtahBeehiver, I think pictures from post 177, 189 and 191 are painting a clear picture. I guess where I'm getting confused is that the undercut that I actually cut in the picture from post 189 follows the ID of my dome. But the overcut I did was intersecting with the undercut at the inside face of my arch brick, which is the error. Also didn't help that I cut those overcuts first. But I think I understand now.

    So, when I was positioning my arch form, I set it so that the Keystone has OD and ID intersections almost exactly as Gulf has illustrated on 191. Looking at the post 189 again, I think my undercut doesn't need to change. Instead, I should measure the distance from bottom of the undercut to the top of the undercut on my keystone (about 1.5") and then mark that line on every brick in the arch. That should reproduce the blue line on post 189.

    From there I can then mark a 4.5" line on the side of each brick, staring at the blue line and intersecting with the top of the wedge at 4.5", which is the depth of my brick. That will produce the purple line shown on post 191.

    Finally the purple lines can be connected on the top of the wedge, yielding the yellow lines from post 189.

    Thanks for your patience!
    Last edited by Macrinehart; 11-27-2022, 03:46 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gulf
    replied
    Here is one included inside the link I previously shared.

    EDIT: It may not be clear in the photo. But, the OD scribe mark is on top of this brick. The purple line is the actual tapered cut. The purple line is drawn from the 1.5" reveal to the OD scribe.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	fetch?photoid=444381.jpg Views:	0 Size:	143.3 KB ID:	451045
    Last edited by Gulf; 11-27-2022, 09:13 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • UtahBeehiver
    replied
    Gulf's pic pegged the issue perfectly. The blue line should be the ID of the dome and the yellow line should be the OD of the dome as shown in my pic in post 177 and also shown in JR's post 117.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gulf
    replied
    Hopefully this rough mark up will help

    Leave a comment:


  • Gulf
    replied
    Ok. It appears that on your top dead center brick that you will have about a 1.5" reveal inside the dome. That is about perfect imo. However, the reveal on your first riser is much wider. Scribe a line on the inside of the arch to make that reveal constant through out. Then scribe an outside diameter on your dome brick. Connect the lines on each side of each brick from those reference points and there you have it. Refer back to my link. It's all there. If you need something on the link explained, I'm here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Macrinehart
    replied
    Today I was able to finish the over and undercuts for the opening arch. I repositioned the arch form per UtahBeehiver's guidance.

    I'll note this is not a perfect job, but is it good enough? Some of my overcuts were a little too deep, I think there is 3/16" - 1/4" variance, which you can see in pictures below. I'm thinking this can be resolved with a little extra morter in the problem areas, although that may not be an ideal solution if the morter is too thick?

    As always...feedback is welcome. If necessary I can pull out some problem bricks and replace them.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_98460.jpg
Views:	414
Size:	417.1 KB
ID:	451022

    Click image for larger version  Name:	20221126_160626.jpg Views:	0 Size:	431.1 KB ID:	451023 Click image for larger version  Name:	20221126_160653.jpg Views:	0 Size:	574.4 KB ID:	451024 Click image for larger version  Name:	20221126_160704.jpg Views:	0 Size:	596.4 KB ID:	451025

    Leave a comment:


  • UtahBeehiver
    replied
    The inside bottom of the arch form should be where the ID of the dome and the form intersect. The cut back is the inside arc of the dome and whether its is perpendicular or not depends on the arch shape. I attached pic showing how the IT scribes the inner dome arc, Click image for larger version

Name:	32B Inner Arch 6.15.12.JPG
Views:	393
Size:	582.5 KB
ID:	451012

    Leave a comment:


  • Macrinehart
    replied
    The tapered arch is only partially done.
    That is correct, I am working on finishing the outside cuts first, and if understand your meaning UtahBeehiver the "cut back" are the cuts that are roughly perpendicular to the cuts I've already made.

    I am going to reposition the arch support per JR's guidance after I finish the outside cuts so that I can mark the IR of the dome on the underside of the opening arch.
    Last edited by Macrinehart; 11-26-2022, 09:20 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • UtahBeehiver
    replied
    The tapered arch is only partially done. There is no cut back that follows in inner diameter of the dome. This is why the top dead center brick is the longest brick and the shortest ones are at the bottom of the arch. This is what Gulf is talking about.in his post. I also believe, as JR pointed out the arch form is too far in and affecting how the inner arch bricks are being formed.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X