Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Michigan WFO

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ThisOldGarageNJ
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    hi mike,
    i think your proportions look fine.... If your worried the peak is too high, put a mosaic over the over door to draw attention away from the peak.. I dont think you need to but i iunderstand how you feel... your doing a great job
    good luck
    Mark

    Leave a comment:


  • mfiore
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    The stone is real. Looks good. I'll post some photos soon.

    I'm actually quite anxious about the roof. More so than the bricks, cement, mortar. That all seemed to flow. I really don't know what to do with the fascia, soffit, flashing, etc. Any recommendations for references?

    I plan to have the stone veneer extend all the way up the sides. As of now, I'm planning slate roof with copper flashing. Not sure what to do with the fascia. I'm debating cutting back the existing roof trusses at the ends to make the overhang on the sides very short. I'm trying to avoid a "dog house" look.

    This is what I mean:


    Any thoughts or suggestions?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lars
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    Mike,
    The two numbers in roof pitch refer to rise over run. The denominator, run, is 12 by convention. A 10:12 roof would be nearly 40 degrees ( since arctan(10/12) = 39.8 degrees)

    I am kind of partial to 6:12. Still high enough to have plenty of slope, but nearly flat enough to walk around on... if you're really careful.


    Good luck with the stone. Is it cast, or real veneer?

    Lars.

    Leave a comment:


  • mfiore
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    Just double checked. The roof is 10:12. I'm clearly not a builder, and never thought in those terms. I was shooting for 40 degrees (that's a unit of measurement I was familiar with). Ended up to be 10:12.

    Ordered some stone veneer today. Most of it will be delivered in a few weeks. I grabbed a few small boxes of corners to get me started. Hopefully I'll have time and sunshine Friday to get some up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lars
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    Mike,
    Your roof pitch is 12:12 isn't it?

    I see what you mean about the 'top heavy' aspect. I bet when you do some kind of stone or brick on the base, and then some kind of arch over that, it will have a more sensible aesthetic.

    I kind of felt the same way about mine ( seems to loom large). Oh well. Had 2nd pizza bake last night. Having trouble getting up to temp AND without a door, the heat really goes away fast.

    L.

    Leave a comment:


  • Les
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    Originally posted by mfiore View Post
    I worry that the peak is too high
    Dude - you live in Michigan , I thought you could go to jail with a roof pitch of less then 12/12 It looks great to me...

    Les...

    Leave a comment:


  • mfiore
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    Originally posted by Dino_Pizza View Post
    Is that mortar or thin set you used where the conc boards come together?


    Have you decided on the stone veneer yet? I'm still considering a thicker "stack stone" or a smaller field stone pattern. Can't wait to see your work.

    Take care, Dino
    I used Type S Mortar to fill the cracks. Same stuff that's supposed to be used for the stone. I don't have any experience with thin set. It might work just as well, or perhaps better. The mortar doesn't really squeeze in the cracks that well. I also started taping the joints with alkali resistant "cement board tape". This was recommended by the cement board manufacturer. I scrapped that idea after a few seams. Really was a pain. Again, perhaps this would have worked better with thinset.

    I don't know what stone to use yet. As with everything else, my decision will be based more upon cost and availability than what I like.

    Leave a comment:


  • KraemerBAC
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    Mike,

    I agree, it looks great..I have abuot 8 blocks left to finish my stand and I hope to get it done today.

    Peter

    Leave a comment:


  • Dino_Pizza
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    Mike, you have officially surpassed ME now. I'm so jealous. Your enclosed oven looks great. I really like your roof peak angle. Looks very nice and will be impressive with the stone veneer. Is that mortar or thin set you used where the conc boards come together? Maybe I need to do that, also fill in some of the uglier screws that went too far into my cement boards.

    I'll be following what you do now closely since I'm on hold for a week. I was slow enough on my WFO that our annual summer pool part is next week so I'm preping for that and everyone expects pizza, not a roof or stone veneer (yet). I'll be making 15 to 20 pizza's in my unfinished oven, steel studs and all.

    Have you decided on the stone veneer yet? I'm still considering a thicker "stack stone" or a smaller field stone pattern. Can't wait to see your work.

    Take care, Dino

    Leave a comment:


  • mfiore
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    Well, it took a while, but I got some time put into the oven today. I finished putting concrete board on the walls. I worry that the peak is too high, looks a little out of balance. I hope it looks better with stone on it. Too late to turn back now.

    I'll pick up some stone veneer this week.

    Leave a comment:


  • Les
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    Awesome work Mike! Steelworkers of America beware

    Les...

    Leave a comment:


  • dbhansen
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    Nice work, Mike. That thing will withstand a nuclear blast!

    Leave a comment:


  • Lars
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    Mike,
    Once you wrap that chimney in blanket, or vermic/portland, I doubt it will open up if it is cracked. I really learned a lot tonight after my fire!

    Even my dome did not crack, and I really insulated according to heat location. More in the upper third of the dome, then the most from the dome top to the flue. Even with a raging fire in the dome, the center outside was 90 degrees ( ambient temp of the day)


    Lars.


    ps. I like the steel framework. It will really withstand the elements. Do you plan to fill with more insulation?

    Leave a comment:


  • mfiore
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    I've been following your progress with the cracks, Lars. I think you're right

    I finished the bulk of the steel framing for the enclosure today. Other than an occasional brace I might need to add for support once I install the cement board, I'm done with this phase. I enjoyed it initially. It then became a real pain (literally, my hands and arms are really nicked up!).



    I'm still not sure how long I want my overhangs to be. I'll wait until some of the stone goes up. I put a length of tracking on the ends of the trusses temporarily. Mainly because I was sick of hitting my forehead on those sharp edges!

    Leave a comment:


  • Lars
    replied
    Re: Michigan WFO

    Mike,
    Read my post in my CRA|CK!!! thread. All crack issues have become total NON issues.

    Lars.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X