Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2024 Neapolitan oven build

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • daidensacha
    replied
    Dome taking shape, 3 courses to go.

    Despite the threat of rain, and the occasional sprinkle, I managed to get another row of bricks done. I reduced the size to 1/3 brick, and they fitted much better than I think 1/2 bricks would have. I got to say that I’m really happy David advocated for using a wet cutting saw over a grinder with masonry blade. I still had occasion to use the 125mm grinder at times, but not a lot. When I did it was super dusty and dirty. Using the wet cutting saw with mr Chipsters jig saves a lot of time and mess.

    I’m now used to walking around the outside of the dome to lay bricks, and gotten used to playing the bricks with near vertical horizontal joints. With a slightly more fluid mix it with the brick positioned with the IT, I’m able to fully fill the joint with cement as it easily flows in. I need to let it sit a minute for the cement to set a bit, then remove the IT while holding the brick and at the same time positioning a cut prop under it to hold it up while it sets so it doesn’t move or fall.

    It’s time consuming given it’s not my profession. This last course yesterday took me 5 hours to set up mr Chipsters jig for the cuts, cut the bricks, to lay them, and then to clean up.

    Overall, with help of my dome shape template that I cross check with for each course, the Neapolitan shape is going to plan.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7031 Large.jpeg
Views:	111
Size:	395.6 KB
ID:	461126 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7030 Large.jpeg
Views:	111
Size:	437.1 KB
ID:	461127 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7033 Large.jpeg
Views:	116
Size:	401.3 KB
ID:	461125 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7032 Large.jpeg
Views:	137
Size:	447.7 KB
ID:	461124 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7013 Large.jpeg
Views:	112
Size:	284.0 KB
ID:	461128

    Leave a comment:


  • david s
    replied
    Ok. It is a technique which gives greater stability and control, used for bracing kilns where the expansion issues are around double what we experience with our ovens, but the same principles apply. For kilns the rods and nuts are usually exposed which allows access for adjustments before, during and after firings.

    Leave a comment:


  • daidensacha
    replied
    Originally posted by david s View Post
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_1317.jpg Views:	1 Size:	40.5 KB ID:	461111 Using two threaded rods gives the brackets far more stability as shown (one pushing the other pulling). With your brick gallery you may not have enough room to do this though.
    I’m not to worried about it, as the tension of the reinforcing straps will be pulling he upright brackets outwards, while the threaded rod across the top will secure them from moving outwardly. The other thing is, on the threaded rod, I plan to put double nuts on the inside and outside of the angle to lock the angles at 90 degrees.

    The Brackets are 50x50x5mm steel angle, professionally welded in a precision engineering factory, which will make them really rigid and resistant to twisting once they are anchored with 10mm stainless concrete anchors.

    Leave a comment:


  • daidensacha
    replied
    Originally posted by nlinva View Post
    There are definitely examples of people mortaring bricks together to serve as keystone.

    A vertical mortar joint can be seen, for example, in Giovanni Rossi's build (post 54 here).

    Other people have also done horizontal mortar joints, which is what I'm about to try doing. Two of my bricks stacked flat on top of each other are only about 1/4" taller than the width of the brick, so the keystone will stick out above the rest of the dome by about that amount, which I'm fine with. It does give you the full flat area of a brick to serve as the keystone, which I like. If I decide that 1/4" bothers me, I may just grind a bit off the top with my angle grinder before dropping it in.

    Right now I'm thinking about how best to mark and measure the shape of the opening so I can transfer it to the bricks. It is not so hard to transfer the bottom shape to the bottom of the keystone, but the challenge is to mark off the top so that not only is the orientation the same, but also the centerpoints line up. Are there tried-and-true tricks for this?
    Thanks, I guess I’ll look at it when I’m there and make a decision then. Really depends on how big the keystone will need to be as to what I will choose to do.

    With some of my more tricky cuts where I felt it was really important to have it fitting well, I made templates from cardboard. Easy to cut with scissors, and easy to start fresh if I cut too much off. Worked well for me.
    Last edited by daidensacha; 09-10-2024, 10:09 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • nlinva
    replied
    There are definitely examples of people mortaring bricks together to serve as keystone.

    A vertical mortar joint can be seen, for example, in Giovanni Rossi's build (post 54 here).

    Other people have also done horizontal mortar joints, which is what I'm about to try doing. Two of my bricks stacked flat on top of each other are only about 1/4" taller than the width of the brick, so the keystone will stick out above the rest of the dome by about that amount, which I'm fine with. It does give you the full flat area of a brick to serve as the keystone, which I like. If I decide that 1/4" bothers me, I may just grind a bit off the top with my angle grinder before dropping it in.

    Right now I'm thinking about how best to mark and measure the shape of the opening so I can transfer it to the bricks. It is not so hard to transfer the bottom shape to the bottom of the keystone, but the challenge is to mark off the top so that not only is the orientation the same, but also the centerpoints line up. Are there tried-and-true tricks for this?

    Leave a comment:


  • david s
    replied
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_1317.jpg Views:	1 Size:	40.5 KB ID:	461111 Using two threaded rods gives the brackets far more stability as shown (one pushing the other pulling). With your brick gallery you may not have enough room to do this though.

    Leave a comment:


  • daidensacha
    replied
    Keystone question

    If my calculations are correct, I will have a hole with a diameter 120-140mm to fill with a keystone to finish my dome. I have my last three courses to do now before fitting the keystone.

    I guess there would be many ways to do it, using multiple stones count to fit. It is feasible to cement two bricks together from which I can cut one piece to fill the hole?

    Leave a comment:


  • daidensacha
    replied
    Originally posted by david s View Post
    Your anchors will be in a place that will be subjected to both heat and moisture, both of which accelerate rusting, be sure to use stainless anchors. Otherwise their failure in a position that’s not accessible easily, could negate the function of the stainless band.
    Yes, I’m using all stainless steel, apart from the brackets which are steel, and will be galvanised. Brackets will be ready next week, hopefully I will have set the keystone in the dome by then and I’ll fix the brackets. Measure the required length for the stainless straps and have them welded to the tightening brackets which I’ll then be able to attach to the galvanised brackets.

    Leave a comment:


  • david s
    replied
    Your anchors will be in a place that will be subjected to both heat and moisture, both of which accelerate rusting, be sure to use stainless anchors. Otherwise their failure in a position that’s not accessible easily, could negate the function of the stainless band.

    Leave a comment:


  • daidensacha
    replied
    Reinforcing brackets being fabricated. Rainy weather slowing progress.

    I thought it would get easier, but I kind of gave up on that notion, as with each obstacle sorted comes another. Now I’m just tackling each obstacle as they come and evolve. I did another course yesterday, the first that I couldn’t complete from inside the oven. That required developing a different skill set to lay standing on the outside of the dome. By the end of the course I got used to it.

    I have 5 more courses to complete the dome now. The angles of the cuts are becoming a little more to think about. My next course is the first where I think I will reduce the size to 1/3 bricks to reduce the horizontal triable gap that is beginning to develop between the bricks.

    I was at an Engineering factory of a friend yesterday, and he is welding up some brackets I designed to fix my stainless support straps around the oven. Should be ready in a week, galvanised to limit rust.

    I made up a template out of wood just as an example, and I think it will work well. Each will fixed to the slab with two anchor bolts, and together with a threaded rod across the top of the arch. From this I made up my plans in sketchup. 50x50x5mm steel angle, galvanised.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6958 Large.jpeg
Views:	154
Size:	341.2 KB
ID:	461094 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1090.jpeg
Views:	130
Size:	118.6 KB
ID:	461095

    The weather lotto here in Bavaria where I live isn’t good this week, cloudy with forecast rain. Yesterday I was lucky, today not. Ideally I would be happy if I have enough windows without rain this week to finish the dome so I can fix my stainless steel reinforcing straps around the oven, and get onto building up the vent. I need to complete this so I can start getting the insulation on the oven.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toiletman
    replied
    Originally posted by daidensacha View Post
    Inner dome brickwork.

    Integrating the dome bricks with the arch was messy, and dusty. I cut the inside of the top of the arch to allow for easier nesting of the dome bricks.

    I cleaned up the dregs today, set my IT for the new course, and took my measurements for the radius, and angle to make cuts tomorrow, weather permitting.

    I also went around the inner joins of the bricks, repointing voids between where the bricks meet. It will not get easier as I progress up the dome, so want to keep it as good as possible while I have easy access.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1061.jpeg
Views:	204
Size:	549.7 KB
ID:	461042 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1062.jpeg
Views:	190
Size:	717.7 KB
ID:	461043 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1060.jpeg
Views:	199
Size:	818.4 KB
ID:	461044 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1063.jpeg
Views:	189
Size:	765.5 KB
ID:	461045
    As expected: impeccable masonry! It's looking really great and you're also making great progress. Like you I'm hoping the weather lotto will give us some more working days towards the wet and cold season....

    Leave a comment:


  • david s
    replied
    The second pic was after the final render coats. Your plan to do some small test batches is a good one. The grain sizes you posted for the vermiculite and the perlite are what I use.

    Leave a comment:


  • daidensacha
    replied
    david s Thanks David.

    My designed base allowed for 100mm ceramic fibre blanket, covered by 150mm vermicrete. At the sides I will need to add that so the sides of the dome meet the sides of the base, but I can go thinner on top with the vermicrete. If I got you correctly, I’ll plan on adding 4 x 35mm layers of vermicrete at a time, a week apart to allow each layer to dry sufficiently before adding the next. Our fist frost is possible from mid October, but we can still have warm days. Weather lotto, will just have to be flexible.

    I think I’ll knock up a small test batch of a few liters of homebrew to test it and get the hang of mixing it. The sizes of the vermiculite and perlite is hopefully going to work, as I mentioned some time ago, i had issues translating fine and medium into German measurement standards. Maybe I could break my vermiculite down a bit if its not fine enough.
    1. 5 parts vermiculite (2-3mm)
    2. 5 parts perlite (2-6mm)
    3. 1 part portland cement powder
    4. 4 parts water (added 1/3 at a time and hand mixed in bucket or barrow)
    5. 1 handful of clay powder per litre of cement added
    I figure I’ll test it to see how it sets up after a day. I’ll post my result, positive or negative and make any required adjustments from there if needed.

    One question about the photos you posted showing the vermicrete being added directly over the blanket. The second shows a really smooth finish, is that only vermicrete, without render? If I can get something close to that finish I’ll be really happy.

    Leave a comment:


  • UtahBeehiver
    replied
    The P/vcrete layers are about 2-3" thick by 4-5" tall over 3" of ceramic blanket. I did not use any clay but I know David S advocated using some for work-ability.

    Leave a comment:


  • david s
    replied
    150mm thick vermicrete layer is very thick. I’ve found if you want a thick layer it is better not to go any thicker than around 35 mm. This takes around a week to dry in ideal conditions, any thicker and the moisture deeper in just doesn’t escape. If you want it thicker then do a second layer after the first one has dried. Excessive insulation is subject to the law of diminished returns. As well as insulating the v’crete evens out the lumps and bumps of the blanket as well as providing a firm substrate onto which you can apply the outer rendered layer, once it’s all dry and the drying fires have been completed.
    This pic shows the vermicrete layer being applied over the blanket. Because it is a corner build (I hate corner builds) there was very little room at the sides. Two layers of blanket there but four on top. I also never bother with chicken wire over the blanket. I believe it's a waste of time, it compresses the blanket, reducing its insulation value. The vermicrete will restore the perfect shape you want.



    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2009.jpeg Views:	0 Size:	53.4 KB ID:	461048 Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2084 2.jpeg Views:	0 Size:	64.1 KB ID:	461049
    Last edited by david s; 09-08-2024, 02:40 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X